Saturday, February 3, 2007
Skipping Stones: A Perspective on Global Warming
Skipping Stones: A Perspective on Global Warming
By G.W. Burrows
By evaluating changes in climate or temperature over shortened
periods, such as decades or centuries instead of hundreds of
thousands or even millions of years, we either overestimate or
overstate the changes that might or might not be occurring.
Sci-Tech Today
June 3, 2005
The contributions of human activities to global warming is a topic of
continuing and intense debate. Unfortunately, the vast majority of
articles and reports on the effects of anthropogenic carbon dioxide
are overstated and exaggerated.
The debate has raged on about the causes and effects of global
warming, but the first question to ask is whether global warming even
exists.
Certainly it does, because without global warming, the earth would be
a much colder place. A good example is our closest neighbor, the
moon, where, even in direct sunlight, without an atmosphere there are
no molecules to absorb and retain the incoming heat from the sun.
The earth's atmosphere contains several gases, all of which have the
capacity to absorb heat energy in varying degrees. The most common
gases are nitrogen, oxygen, water and carbon dioxide. There also are
trace gases such as argon, methane and hydrogen, but their
concentrations are all much less than one percent.
Periodic changes in temperature give rise to climates that vary
widely from polar regions to the tropics. Climate is caused by more
than just global warming. The main causal factors of climate change
are the eccentricity of the earth's orbit around the sun, the tilt of
the rotational axis and its wobble.
Sun spot activity, ocean currents and albedo (whiteness) also
contribute to climate and climate change. The issue that has to be
addressed is how much of an effect carbon dioxide has on climate
change.
Experts agree that the earth's climate is primarily caused by the
distance from the sun, the shape and changes in the orbit and tilt of
the rotational axis. As long as the sun continues to burn, we will be
warm. Astronomers believe that the sun is middle aged and we have
approximately 4 billion years to go before it turns into a white
dwarf.
If you believe mainstream scientists, the earth's age is estimated to
be 4.5 billion years old. For the first billion years or so, the
earth was a hot and barren place with no oxygen in the atmosphere.
Since there was no oxygen, there was also no ozone. But after a
billion years, life began to form, the climate stabilized and oxygen
resulting from photosynthesis began to occupy the atmosphere.
Since that time, the climate has remained stable and conducive to
various life forms. The oceans have never frozen nor boiled. During
that time there have been changes in average temperature, sometimes
warmer and sometimes colder than our present-day climate.
Climatological studies of ice core samples have shown that about
every 100,000 to 150,000 years, the earth goes through a relatively
short period of warming followed by a longer period of cooling,
including an ice age. The warming period is approximately 20,000
years long and the cooling period lasts about 100,000 years.
During the last cooling period, ice covered the northern and
southernmost areas from 45 degrees North and 45 degrees South, to the
poles. The middle latitudes remained free of ice, therefore warm and
hospitable to most life forms. The last ice age ended approximately
20,000 years ago and the earth has been warming ever since, so it is
no surprise to expect that the next ice age is not far off.
Since the last ice age, the climate has warmed about 16 degrees
Fahrenheit and the sea level has risen approximately 300 feet. Humans
have only been around for about 1.75 million years. The warming and
cooling cycles were happening long before human existence.
Even more recently, the last ice age ended and warming began
thousands of years before the industrial revolution. Current changes
in temperature and climate have been blamed on CO2 production from
the industrial revolution, which began only 200 years ago, but
numerous reports have compared CO2 atmospheric concentrations over
the last 200 years in an attempt to prove the relationship between
the concentration of CO2 and the increase in average global
temperatures.
So what effect have human activities had on climate? To some extent,
quite a lot. Building large cites creates "heat islands," which cause
localized changes in weather. Massive deforestation (for example, in
the tropics) causes changes in the hydrological (rain) cycle.
Pollution contributes to changes in atmospheric chemistry; for
example, smog and particulates produce haze and ozone as well as
other pollutants such as NOX (various nitrogen oxides). Refrigerants
are blamed for destruction of ozone.
But what about carbon dioxide? Produced by all forms of combustion
and fermentation, CO2 has been the focus of debate on climate change
to such an extent that controls on CO2 production have been connected
to world economics (Kyoto Treaty) and pollution bartering.
At the present time, carbon dioxide makes up approximately 0.03
percent (or 300 parts per million) of the earth's atmosphere. In and
of itself, that number is small when compared to the other major
gases in the atmosphere. For example, oxygen and nitrogen are present
at 21 and 78 percent respectively.
To obtain a sense for how much heat carbon dioxide absorbs and
therefore contributes to global warming, the following information
must also be considered.
More than 98 percent of all CO2 in the atmosphere is produced by
sources other than by man. For example, CO2 is produced by forest
fires, volcanoes, fermentation and animal and plant respiration.
Carbon dioxide does not remain in the atmosphere. It is absorbed in
the oceans, lakes and rivers and is used by marine life to produce
shells and food. It is also used by terrestrial plants to produce
cellulose, sugar and other plant products.
Carbon dioxide is an essential and beneficial nutrient and is
actively involved in a dynamic, not static process.
By comparison, water is present in the atmosphere in amounts varying
from a few tenths of a percent in desert areas to as much as 4
percent in humid tropical areas. The amount of atmospheric water
content changes dramatically with temperature and air pressure.
Clouds and fog are made up of water and 70 percent of the earth's
surface is covered with water. Approximately 500 billion tons of
carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide are added to the atmosphere each
day, of which 98 percent is naturally produced.
In other words, only 2 percent is anthropogenic. Around 1.16 billion
tons of water is evaporated each day. At any given time, there are
106 billion tons of carbon dioxide and 12.9 x 106 billion tons of
water in the atmosphere.
And so the important question is "What do all of these numbers mean?"
First, there is a lot more water in the atmosphere than CO2. Second,
the amount of CO2 pumped into the atmosphere by human activities is
small when compared to the amount of water already in the atmosphere.
Finally we also must evaluate how much heat energy both carbon
dioxide and water are capable of absorbing. Pound-for-pound, water
absorbs two times more heat energy than CO2. The difference comes
from how much vibrational energy the oxygen-hydrogen (OH) bonds
absorb than that of the carbon-oxygen (C=O) bonds.
What then can we derive from all of the different information on
global warming?
First, all of the data presented are factual, accurate and generally
accepted by the established scientific community noting that many of
the absolute numbers vary slightly depending on the source.
Global warming does occur as a result of all atmospheric gases
absorbing and retaining heat energy from the sun.
Heat also is absorbed by land surfaces and reflected by snow, clouds
and other light colored surfaces.
At any given time, climate is largely controlled by the energy of the
sun and the earth's position relative to the sun.
The amount of carbon dioxide added to the atmosphere by human
activities (2 percent of 0.03 percent, which is 0.000006 percent)
when compared to water that is always present (range of 0.5 percent
to 4 percent) is a very small amount.
Pound-for-pound, water absorbs two times more heat energy than carbon
dioxide.
Too often, experts, and even scientists study and report the effects
of CO2 on climate in a manner that is similar to the story of five
blind men describing an elephant. Each one views the elephant as a
completely different being because he doesn't include the information
from any of the others.
The situations with studies or reports on global warming are similar.
Unless we consider all of the factors that contribute to our climate
simultaneously, we are using an unscientific technique known as data
selection, which is inappropriate in thorough and accurate research.
By evaluating changes in climate or temperature over shortened
periods, such as decades or centuries instead of hundreds of
thousands or even millions of years, we either overestimate or
overstate the changes that might or might not be occurring. Data
selection can be used to verify any reasonable conclusion about
climate change.
Because there is a lot more water in the atmosphere than carbon
dioxide and because water absorbs so much more energy than carbon
dioxide, we should conclude that the effect that these gases have on
the warming of the atmosphere is largely caused by water. Man's
contribution, although it certainly exists, is more like throwing a
stone into the ocean, real and calculable, but barely noticeable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
G.W. Burrows is a retired analytical chemist and former director of
toxicology and environmental chemistry laboratories. Burrows
currently teaches chemistry, biology and environmental science.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment